- Panos Garganas, The Radical Left: A Richer Mix.
- François Sabado, Building the New Anticapitalist Party.
Sunday, 24 May 2009
UNITYblog EDITORIAL: Debate on broad left strategy continues within IST
The global debate about how Marxists should organise politically in the current epoch is continuing. The debate centres on the question of whether Marxists opt to maintain a narrow Marxist organisation or join together unreservedly with other leftists in broad left political formations.
This crucial debate is intersecting with the question of how the left responds to the global economic crisis. Without a viable political force which mobilises masses of people the result of the crisis will be devastating for ordinary people.
Socialist Worker-New Zealand supports the broad left strategy, which has been articulated in the articles and statements. See History calls for a broad left party and Organising to build a global broad left movement.
Our ideas have been raised within the International Socialist Tendency (IST), to which we are affiliated. In the interests of furthering this important debate we are posting on UNITYblog an exchange of ideas between Alex Callinicos, leading British Socialist Worker Party member, and European activists Panos Garganas and François Sabado.
In International Socialist Journal (ISJ) issue 121, (Winter 2008) Garganas and Sabado responded to Callinicos's original article Where is the Radical Left Going? (Issue 120, Autumn 2008). See:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Personally, I would say the biggest obstacle to a real broad party in NZ at the moment is "critical mass". People will get involved once they see that a given structure is saying things that make sense, backing them up with practice, and getting results. The third is of course the most difficult bit, and at the moment you have several small groups acting in isolation, although with quite similar goals. This must change if we are to get somewhere - whether by RAM or another group growing and becoming hegemonic, or people putting aside their differences to build something greater.
Why is this nonsense of a "broad left" still being discussed, it's ultimately either a dishonesty or wishful thinking. If this broad left is going to be anything more than an indulgence of the extreme left fringe then those advocating it would be seeking to work with the mainstream union movement, the Greens and the Labour Party. It is difficult to believe that SW-NZ sees RAM as anything more than a front organisation rather than a seedling that could replace the broad (as the dictionary defines it) left parties that gained 1 million odd votes at the last election. Or why not dispense with this broad left nonsense and be upfront about defining this desired movement as being far left and based on Marxism? Would that be more honest.
And then of course given that capitalism is facing it's greatest challenge since the 1930s why has SW-NZ or similar travelers been unable to stand a candidate in the Mt Albert election?
"It is difficult to believe that SW-NZ sees RAM as anything more than a front organisation"
Why is that difficult to believe, Richard?
RAM is in fact working with the Greens in Mt Albert to support the candidacy of Dr Russel Norman. Your whole comment seems based on things that you have assumed in advanced, rather than actually watching what RAM is doing.
Post a Comment