Saturday, 11 September 2010

International backing grows for 'Robin Hood tax' on banks

EU ministers edge closer to financial transaction levy amid signs that International Monetary Fund is softening opposition to 'Robin Hood tax'

European Union finance ministers will step up talks on raising extra money from banks this week amid signs that the International Monetary Fund is softening its opposition to a "Robin Hood tax" on financial transactions.
Treasury sources said the chancellor, George Osborne, was prepared to back a financial activities tax on bank profits and pay at the Brussels meeting provided it was universally introduced, but was wary of a broader Robin Hood tax. Campaigners said last night, however, that a leaked IMF report showed growing international backing for a broader tax and urged Osborne to look at the revenue-raising potential of a levy of transactions.
David Hillman, a Robin Hood Campaign spokesman, said: "The rug has been pulled from under critics who claim that a Robin Hood tax would damage the wider economy or is unworkable. The IMF, EC and Leading Group of 60 nations have all said it is feasible. The main losers would be those who make lots of money from socially useless trades but the winners would be millions of people at home and abroad pushed into poverty by the economic crisis or whose public services are under threat."
An IMF paper, Taxing Financial Transactions: Issues and Evidence, said securities transactions taxes (STT) existed in many countries with little evidence that they distorted markets. It argued that a small levy on transactions might help to dampen the "herding behaviour" encouraged by computer-program trading. "Unilateral STTs, even if levied on fairly narrow bases, are certainly feasible as witnessed by their use in numerous developed countries. The fact that major financial centers such as the UK, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Africa levy forms of STTs indicates that such taxes do not automatically drive out financial activity to an unacceptable extent," it said.
The paper added: "The impact on financial markets from a low-rate (less than 5 basis points), broad-based STT would likely be fairly modest, beyond its reduction of very short-term trading."
In its letter to Osborne, the Robin Hood campaign said a financial activities tax could, if combined with other measures, raise as much as £20bn a year in the UK. "We hope that the Ecofin meeting will provide a platform for taking this forward at the European level. Ultimately, we believe that a financial transaction tax has the greatest potential to raise revenue from the financial sector, as it offers a robust, simple to implement and fair mechanism."

Thursday, 9 September 2010

Campaign to remove GST from food continues

by Vaughan Gunson
Tax Justice campaign coordinator

By voting down Maori Party MP Rahui Katene’s bill to remove GST from healthy food (see below), National, ACT and United Future have shown themselves to be offside with grassroots sentiment. The majority of New Zealanders think it’s criminal that food, a necessity of life, is made more expensive by this hated tax.

The Tax Justice campaign is circulating a petition which calls on GST to be removed from food and for financial speculation to be taxed instead. 12,000 signatures have been collected since the campaign was launched in late May. And we’re just getting warmed up.

We’re planning to collect many more signatures so that out-of-touch politicians in parliament are forced to listen to the will of the people. That’s what democracy should be about.

On 1-2 October we’re planning a Double Day of nationwide signature collecting for the Tax Justice petition. With GST going up to 15% on 1 October we expect a tremendous response from people who are angry about the escalating cost of living.

It’s good news that the Maori Party wants to continue its opposition to GST on food. The more parties and grassroots organisations working together on this, the more chance we have of achieving success.

YOU CAN HELP

Take part in the nationwide Double Day of signature collecting for the Tax Justice petition on 1-2 October.

Contact Vaughan Gunson, the campaign coordinator, right now. Email svpl@xtra.co.nz or ph/txt 021-0415 082.


To download the Tax Justice petition click here.

House rejects bid to remove GST from healthy food

from Radio New Zealand News
9 September

The Maori Party’s attempt to have GST removed from healthy foods was defeated in Parliament on Wednesday night.

A member’s bill in the name of Rahui Katene was rejected by 64 votes to 56, being opposed by the National, ACT and United Future parties.

Ms Katene told Parliament GST hits lower-income earners disproportionately because they spend a higher proportion of their income on food.

She says food prices have risen more than 20% in the past three years but real incomes have risen only slightly.

The Labour Party supported the bill but says that if the Maori Party were serious about removing GST on healthy food, it would not have supported the Government’s Budget, which raised GST to 15%.

The National Party says defining what is healthy is too difficult.

Ms Katene and the other Maori Party MPs say the bill’s defeat is not the end of the issue.

Moana Jackson on new foreshore and seabed law

A further primer on the foreshore and seabed
the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill


Formatted printable version


8 September 2010

‘I once spoke of our people who have their mana attacked being like a beached whale struggling to live … what I say now is to remember how often the sea casts the whale on the shore’. - Te Ataria, 1889.

‘The question that must always be asked of legislation is not whether it is a legislative compromise or even whether it is practical, but whether it is just’. - Justice Thurgood Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, 1970.


  • Abstract



  • This Primer is part of material produced for hui within Ngati Kahungunu on the foreshore and seabed that began with the original proposals put forward on the issue by the last government in 2003.

    It addresses some of the main parts of the new Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill and asks questions about the new regime it establishes for the foreshore and seabed.

    It tries to provide some context for the Bill by considering the grounds that have compelled Maori to so forcefully and consistently voice concern about the issue over the last several years - it considers the attempts the people have made to avoid being ‘beached’ by the various Crown proposals since 2003.

    It also tries to apply the test for legislative legitimacy outlined by Justice Marshall and assesses whether the Bill is just.

    It regrettably concludes that it is not.

    It further concludes that the proposed Bill simply consolidates the main inequities of the 2004 Seabed and Foreshore Act that the Waitangi Tribunal found to be problematic in terms of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination held to be racially discriminatory.

    In that context the Prime Minister’s statement that the Bill will be a full and final settlement of the issue is simply inaccurate because rather than removing the injustice it actually compounds it.  
    - Moana Jackson

    Wednesday, 8 September 2010

    Why We Need To Tax Financial Speculation

    By Vaughan Gunson
    Tax Justice campaign coordinator
    from CAFCA’s “Foreign Control Watchdog”, August 2010


    The figures are mind blowing. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that the financial crisis cost the world $US11.9 trillion. The human cost is immeasurable. And it ain’t over. The international bailouts of banks and other financial institutions have seen trillions of dollars of private debt off-loaded onto governments. The financial crisis has not been fixed. The problem has just been shifted. The bailouts have created a “sovereign debt crisis”, which is breaking first in Europe. Governments worldwide are scrambling to get debt under control. The “fiscal stimulus” that accompanied the wave of banking bailouts has now passed over to “austerity measures”, which means cuts to public services and higher taxes for grassroots people. Those who had no part, no say, and no responsibility for the financial crisis are being made the victims, many times over.

    The leaders of a club of rich countries called the G20 (Group of 20) recently met in Toronto, Canada. The strategy of making us pay for the crisis was clear. G20 leaders issued a joint statement on 27/6/10 committing member countries to halving their budget deficits by 2013 [1]. As Toronto resident and anti-capitalist campaigner Naomi Klein wrote: “Faced with the effects of a crisis created by the world’s wealthiest and most privileged strata, they decided to stick the poorest and most vulnerable people in their countries with the bill” [2]. This is what the world’s elite are trying to get away with, if we let them.


    Austerity Hits New Zealand

    The New Zealand economy nose-dived into recession in 2009 as the financial crisis quickly spread to the real economy. There have been widespread job losses and general job insecurity, as well as stagnant or declining wages relative to inflation. Many people are struggling under the burden of mortgage and credit card debt. Our Government has not bailed out banks like the US or Britain, but the impact of the crisis on the Government’s budget has been similar to overseas: declining tax revenue from falling economic activity, combined with increased spending demands, like unemployment benefits.

    The policy “solution” that the John Key government is pursuing is no different from the dominant policy response by governments around the globe. Protect the rich and do everything possible to get the economy going again under much the same model as before. Increase taxes on grassroots people, while restricting their access to public services. National’s 2010 Budget saw direct cuts to Government spending, like early child care. And effective cuts, as funding increases for health and education failed to keep pace with inflation. More social spending cuts have been signalled. Many public sector employees are facing the axe as the budgets of Government departments are slashed.

    Amidst this austerity, National still delivered tax cuts to the rich and big corporates. This benevolence to the rich was funded by increasing the goods and services tax (GST) from 12.5% to 15%. It’s widely accepted that GST is a regressive tax which disproportionately impacts on grassroots people, who spend most of their weekly income on the basics. Many people in New Zealand and around the world smell a rat. The scale of the much reported banking bailouts, the ongoing impact of the crisis on our lives, as we worry about our jobs and paying off debt, has raised the question for many: is there something wrong here?

    The Speculators

    We need to understand what’s wrong so we can organise strategically to defend ourselves. Crucial to that understanding, is grasping the dominant role financial speculation has assumed in the world economy. Financial speculation is defined on Wikipedia as “the buying, holding, selling, and short-selling of stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, collectibles, real estate, derivatives, or any valuable financial instrument to profit from fluctuations in its price, irrespective of its underlying value” [3]. Speculation has long been a part of the capitalist economy, with its damaging effects well documented, if often ignored.

    But what we’re seeing today is historically unprecedented. In 2008, the trade in derivatives [4]– the most speculative of financial transactions – was $US500 trillion, which was ten times the value of the entire world’s output of tangible products and services. Much of this speculative activity is computer automated, with “purchases” lasting minutes or even seconds. The rapid growth in commodity speculation over the last decade has led to such perverse phenomena as a barrel of oil being traded, on average, 27 times before it reaches the pumps.

    The reason for all this speculation is quite simple: the profits to be made from traditional investment in capitalist enterprises that produce something of value has been in decline since the post-war economic boom came to an end in the early 1970s. Today’s unprecedented levels of financial speculation represents the desire, on the part of the world’s elite, to continue reaping high profits, way more than the stagnant real economy will allow [5]. To achieve this, governments worldwide have removed all barriers to financial speculation and encouraged a supply of cheap credit by banks and other sanctioned lenders. A giant financial casino has been created, where everything that fluctuates in price has attracted the speculators [6].

    Just like in the real economy, where large companies grow to dominate industries, so it is in the world of financial speculation. The last two decades have seen the rise of giant investment funds, where investors – usually rich wealthy ones – pool their money together in the hope of achieving better returns from long term investments and short term speculation. Billion dollar pension funds and hedge funds, by the very size, can influence the markets. In 2008, it was estimated that pension funds globally controlled US$20 trillion in assets. Hedge funds, which are most often involved in pure speculation, managed around $US2.5 trillion immediately prior to the financial crisis[7]. In sum, financial speculation has grown to 60 times the level of the world’s combined gross domestic product (GDP)[8].

    Government-Banks-Speculator Nexus

    The governments of the world have acted as the “public facilitators” of global financial speculation. They’ve done so in partnership with the big banks, who are the “private facilitators” of speculation. The world’s big banks are either directly engaged in speculation, being at the epicentre of all financial activity and thus able to read trends and manipulate the markets, or they supply the credit with which others play in the casino. Thus the banks are the biggest speculators of them all. And they’ve got fatter and fatter. America’s six largest banks have combined assets totalling 63% of the United State’s gross domestic product. The extent of the banks’ ascendency is revealed by the fact that only 15 years ago the combined assets of the six biggest banks were 17% of GDP9.

    It’s an open secret that Wall Street banks have entered markets with the aim of generating a price bubble. After making their speculative profits they’ve exited the market, collapsing the bubble, before moving on to the next market. The housing bubble followed the dot.com bubble, then the oil price bubble. Next it was the food price bubble. These aren’t speculative bubbles caused by the random vagaries of the market, but orchestrated on high by powerful banking interests, with the blessing of Washington regulators.

    Grant Morgan, in his essay “Beware! The End is Nigh! Why global capitalism is tipping towards collapse, and how we can act for a decent future”, argues that financialisation is the central pillar of neo-liberalism, the economic agenda promoted by Big Business and imposed by governments around the world over the last three decades. He likens the massive expansion of the financial sector, with its easy credit and speculative bubbles, to a global Ponzi* scam, one protected by government laws, corporate politicians and state officials[10].

    [*A pyramid scheme whereby original investors are paid beguiling dividends from new advances. Bernie Madoff is the most high profile recent perpetrator. These scams are still called Ponzi schemes, after Charles Ponzi, who provoked the 1925 Florida real estate bubble. Ed.]

    Speculation has been hard-wired into the global economy. Those who control financial systems reap the rewards, but only by causing structural damage to the whole system. All reasonable logic says that this must end, that it’s unsustainable. But as global capitalism has bet everything on financialisation, there’s no possibility of turning back. The government-banks-speculator nexus, from the point of the view of the world’s elite, has to continue[11].

    Crimes Against Humanity

    Waves of global speculation have had an enormous impact on the world economy and the lives of the grassroots majority. The housing bubble pushed house prices through the roof and caused grassroots people to be burdened with historically high levels of debt. When the housing bubble in the US burst in 2007, the big financial players quickly went looking for a new market to speculate in. They turned to another necessity of life: food. World rice prices – a staple for much of the world’s population – increased by 320% between January 2007 and June 2008. The price for wheat went up 240%[12]. There was no reason for this other than the deliberate creation of a price bubble by powerful financial players able to shift billions into these markets, chiefly big American banks, with the rest following.

    That bubble burst as the financial crisis hit, but food prices haven’t come all the way back down. Once prices rise, other corporates in the food chain have an interest in keeping prices at the higher level. Food distributors and supermarket chains are quick to seize the opportunity to skim some extra profit. So we’re still paying more for rice and bread than we were in 2007. Governments, big and small, are facilitating this crime against humanity. In 2000, the United States government passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which allowed non-grain producers to buy derivatives on the grain futures market. The intended beneficiaries of the law change: pension funds, hedge funds, and all sorts of other financial speculators, including big banks.

    Of course if you’re a big corporate bank you don’t want to actually physically own a whole lot of grain, to sell or do anything else with it. But what derivatives markets do is allow speculators to trade in pieces of paper (“promises to buy” in the future) instead. Jayati Ghosh, a respected Indian researcher and campaigner, explains: “[W]hat’s happened, really, in this decade, is that the possibility of speculation in food grain has been delinked from the physical holding of the commodity: you don’t need to hold a commodity anymore; you can hold pieces of paper, which are contracts on the price for the future”[13] .

    Speculative bubbles never last, but if you’re a big player able to manipulate prices through the sheer scale of your purchases, then you can make a killing. And it’s a killing field indeed, because grain, or any other basic food commodity that gets turned into a speculative bubble, means a global price spike, which causes the world’s poorest to starve. In 2007-08, the number of people suffering from malnutrition globally rose from 800 million to one billion. This was the direct result of financial speculation in food. Ghosh believes another food bubble is being manufactured. World food prices have been rising since April 2009, and not because of increasing demand or contracting supply, but speculation again in commodity futures markets.

    Speculation In New Zealand

    While New Zealand’s finance sector is not big by world standards, the same banks-speculators-government nexus exists. Since 1984 a priority of both Labour and National governments has been deregulation of all parts of the financial industry. This has opened up New Zealand’s financial markets to international and local speculators, resulting in price volatility and inevitable cycles of boom and bust. One market that attracts high levels of speculation is the New Zealand currency market. The Kiwi dollar is the 11th most traded currency in the world. New Zealand certainly isn’t the 11th biggest economy in the world with a massive turn over of trade. Global speculators have created a market for the Kiwi dollar. It’s like a special game of roulette has been created in the South Pacific for the world’s high rollers.

    Despite its relatively small size the New Zealand stock market is also subject to plenty of speculative activity. The volume of shares traded is quite substantial. In June 2010, for example, daily turnover ranged between $50 million and $120 million. Like all stock markets around the world a large percentage of this trade is by speculators – mostly overseas ones – betting on share price fluctuations. Share purchases for long term investment are only a small fraction of regular trading activity.

    The John Key government wants to encourage more speculation in New Zealand. Perhaps this is not surprising, given that John Key made his fortune in the world of high finance. But it also reflects the fact that the Government, and the economy as it stands, is locked in tight to the model of hyper-financialisation which remains the source of so much profit for the rich. The Government has given the green light for NZX, the company that runs the New Zealand stock market, to create a derivatives market for milk. This market for “promises to buy” will see milk prices directly influenced by local and international speculators. Milk and milk products will therefore get caught up in any food price bubble[14].

    John Key has also floated the idea of turning New Zealand into a “financial hub”. The plan rests on enticing global investors to New Zealand with the promise of tax breaks. A recent Inland Revenue Department report entitled “Allowing a zero per cent tax rate for non-residents investing in a PIE [portfolio investment entity]” reveals what’s being considered. Under this proposal, overseas investors would be allowed to operate in this country and not pay New Zealand tax on their international investments. Perhaps the greatest wrong is the establishment of an Emissions Trading Scheme, or pollution market, as it should truthfully be known. The Government’s pollution market will be another opportunity for the speculators, which is precisely why the world’s big banks and other financial institutions are pushing carbon trading as a solution to climate change. It won’t be a solution, far from it, but it will be another market for them to profit from.

    Tax The Speculators!

    The scale of the bailouts, in the US and Europe in particular, has caused great anger amongst grassroots people worldwide, and this has led to some politicians proposing measures to try and reform the financial industry. The global crisis has not, however, reversed the “free licence” that governments have given to the world’s financial speculators. Their ability to grow their wealth and power remains intact. But they are potentially vulnerable, for the reason that the role the banks and other financial institutions have played in the crisis is becoming understood by many grassroots people. It’s therefore imperative that our side flames the fires of anger by further exposing the government-banks-speculator nexus, while at the same time putting forward solutions.

    That’s where the New Zealand campaign for tax justice launched by Socialist Worker and the Alliance Party comes in. The immediate focus of the campaign is a non-citizens’ initiated referendum petition which requests Parliament to 1) Remove GST from food; and 2) Tax financial speculation. These two demands address major injustices in New Zealand’s tax system. Grassroots people have to pay tax on one of life’s necessities, food, while financial speculation goes untaxed. Overseas speculators playing New Zealand’s financial markets do not pay a cent of tax on their market gains to the New Zealand government. Likewise, the rich in this country pay no tax on their wheeling and dealing. The main exemption from GST today is for “financial services”, which includes all the activities associated with financial speculation. Taxing financial speculation, as demanded by the Tax Justice petition, would be a progressive reform of a tax system that currently favours the wealthy[15].

    Build The Real Economy

    The first principle of progressive taxation is that you tax the rich more than poor. On this count taxing financial speculation is progressive. It’s only the very rich who speculate. The second principle of progressive taxation is that you tax things that society wants to discourage. Global financial speculation ruins more lives than smoking, and costs society astronomically more in dollar terms, so if any bad habit needed to be taxed, it’s financial speculation. The best way to make the speculators pay more tax is to hit them at the point where they accumulate their wealth, which is when they buy and sell. This can be done through what’s called a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), a small percentage tax (perhaps 1% or less) on financial transactions.

    Barry Coates, executive director of Oxfam New Zealand, is all for a Financial Transaction Tax, so that “taxes on life’s essentials [like GST]” can be replaced “with a tax on socially destructive financial speculation”[16]. A Financial Transaction Tax would net billions, for example, from speculative trading in the Kiwi dollar alone. Not all of this trade occurs in New Zealand, but a sovereign country can place a tax or levy on the trade of its own currency taking place any where in the world17. A big positive of a FTT is that it would reduce the volume of short-term financial transactions, often computer automated, by large institutional speculators, big banks, pension funds, hedge funds, and the like. A small percentage tax at the point of purchase and sale would wipe out any profits the really big spenders are able to make from short term speculation.

    The main obstacle to taxing the speculators is political. The beneficiaries of the current environment of gung ho speculation will oppose any move to curb their profits and power. That’s what privileged elites have always done. They’ll put up arguments like: “it’s too difficult”, when it’s not. They’ll say it will cost “Kiwi jobs”. It won’t, because speculation only benefits the speculator, creating economic havoc in the process. The global financial meltdown of 2008 will forever be proof of this. The political arguments for taxing the speculators can be won. Following the global financial implosion, the time is right to popularise a tax which hits the most hated global purveyors of greed and exploitation. That’s the aim of the Tax Justice campaign (for more information go to http://www.nogstonfood.org/).

    In the longer term we need to wrest control of the economy off the speculators, banks, and those politicians wedded to hyper-financialised capitalism. We need to re-engineer the economy and direct energy and expertise into the sustainable production of real things, useful things, by useful people. Deciding the direction to go is not really the problem, there’s plenty of good ideas around that can guide us towards a more people-centred economy. The challenge is connecting with people on a mass scale, and achieving the necessary unity of action to begin that journey. A popular campaign for tax justice could be a spearhead for a wider movement that takes on the speculators and raises an alternative vision of an economy that works for us.


    End Notes

    1. Larry Elliott and Patrick Wintour, “G20 nations commit to halving budget deficits by 2013”, guardian.co.uk, 28/6/10.

    2. Naomi Klein, “Let’s take no orders to slash and burn from this G20 club”, from guardian.co.uk, 29/6/10.

    3. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculation.

    4. Derivatives are contractual promises to buy a commodity at an agreed price in the future. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(finance).

    5. One measure of the floundering real economy is under-utilisation of industry capacity, which was 70-80% prior to the financial crisis, and has worsened since.

    6. See the section on financialisation, “Follow the money”, in Grant Morgan’s essay, “Beware! The end is nigh! Why global capitalism is tipping towards collapse, and how we can act for a decent future”, Unity Journal, March 2010, pp16-27.

    7. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_funds.

    8. Barry Coates, “We could replace tax on essentials with one on destructive speculation”, Stuff News, 2/3/10.

    9. Grant Morgan, “Beware! The end is nigh! Why global capitalism is tipping towards collapse, and how we can act for a decent future”, Unity Journal, March 2010, pp.20-21.

    10. Grant Morgan, ibid. p.21

    11. But the point where it’s impossible for governments to be the “lender of last resort”, and bailout the system again, is fast approaching. The whole hyper-financialised world economy faces collapse as it comes up against real world economic and political limits.

    12. Jayati Ghowsh interview, The Real News Network, http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option+com_content&task+view&id+31&Itemid+74&jumival+5067

    13. Jayati Ghowsh interview, ibid.

    14. Hamish Rutherford, ‘‘Serious interest’ in derivatives”, 18/4/10.

    15. He wasn’t speaking for all New Zealand’s mega-wealthy, but Trade Me founder Sam Morgan was telling the truth when he said he hardly pays any tax.

    16. Barry Coates, “We could replace tax on essentials with one on destructive speculation”, 2 /3/10.

    17. Barry Coates, ibid. Collecting this levy should be one of the functions of a Reserve Bank operating in the interests of the grassroots New Zealanders rather than the international financial institutions.

    Monday, 6 September 2010

    Will uninsured be out in the cold?

    By David
    in Christchurch

    I’m shocked to learn that the Earthquake commission’s “EQCover applies only to residential homes that are insured against fire.”

    In my naivety I had always assumed that the state’s EQC covered everyone, because private insurance wouldn’t cover earthquake damage. I should have known better.

    So will all those too poor to afford fire insurance be out in the cold?

    The Cabinet is meeting today and John Key has already recognized that the bill beyond what is covered by insurance will be “large”.

    The government was quick to extend the South Canterbury Finance bailout to investors who weren’t covered under the Government Guarantees Scheme.

    The Left must demand that the same thing happens to the far needier victims of the Christchurch earthquake.

    And we must work to ensure that Christchurch doesn’t end up like New Orleans, where working class people received little or no assistance, while the disaster was used as an excuse to unleash an experiment in “disaster capitalism”.

    Latest UNITY Journal - purchase a copy now


    Cost $5.

    To purchase a copy email socialist-worker@pl.net


    CONTENTS:

    5 Our actions shape the future
    Daphne lawless, editor of UNITY

    9 The pollution market and the bad banks
    DAVID PARKER, eco-blogger

    17 Sub-prime crisis, global economic crisis … ecotastrophe?
    ROB george, NZEI organiser (personal capacity)

    39 How to avoid ecocide at the petrol pump
    Kay Weir, editor of Pacific Ecologist

    43 The Belém Ecosocialist Declaration

    52 The E.I.N., chapter two: what is to be done?
    JOEL KOVEL, Ecosocialist International Network

    56 Climate Action Now!
    Socialist Alliance (Australia)

    63 Socialist Alliance 10-point plan

    65 Bolivarian ecosocialism
    Sam mcgill, Revolutionary Communist Group (Britain)

    69 Book review: Will capitalism end in your life?
    GRANT BROOKES, Socialist Worker – New Zealand

    83 Book review: Plan a city, save the world?
    DAVID, Socialist Worker – New Zealand

    84 Book review: Ecosocialist solutions to the capitalist crisis
    ASH PEMBERTON, Green Left Weekly (Australia)


    Get a postal subscriptions to UNITY Journal

    Four issues a year
    Inside NZ: $25 for one year

    Make cheque out to 'UNITY'
    Send to Box 13-685, Auckland
    Include you address and details

    UNITY Journal editorial - Our actions shape the future

    by Daphne Lawless, editor

    A great example of commodity fetishism – or, the way in which living under capitalist society makes us believe that things which are not real are, in fact, real – is what is commonly known as “the miracle of compound interest”. Blogger Erin Burt from kiplinger.com enthuses: “It magically turns a little bit of money, invested wisely, into a whole lot of cash.”

    Actually, as any Marxist can tell you, there’s no magic in that. A bank account full of money doesn’t breed as if it were a nest of cockroaches, although there are similarities. Exponential growth in bank deposits is made possible by exponential growth in the real world of commodities which those deposits are designed to purchase. And the exponential growth which – as Waikato union organiser and permaculturalist Rob George puts it in this issue – is “in capitalism’s DNA” is based on continually intensifying exploitation of both labour and nature. The miracle of compound interest is the miracle of how much working people – and planet Earth – can tolerate being vampirized.

    In a sense, this issue of UNITY follows on from not only the last issue – which showcased Grant Morgan’s blockbuster article setting out the case that capitalism is on a collapse trajectory – but from our January 2006 issue, “System Change Not Climate Change”. We aim to show in this issue that the natural, physical limits to exponential capitalist growth – the resource and climate crises mentioned in our last issue – will lead to a crash and replacement with some other system, sooner than later, no matter the system’s inbuilt defenses.

    Unite Union: Workers worried about earthquake pay


    Unite Union Media Release
    6 September 2010

    Unite Union's Christchurch office has been flooded with phone calls and text messages from worried workers in post-earthquake Christchurch.

    "Many workers at Christchurch's restaurants, cinemas, hotels and security firms are worried that they will not be paid for the working days lost because of the earthquake. We are very worried that some employers will seek to withhold payment for work that employees were rostered to do over the weekend," said Unite's Christchurch organiser Matt Jones.

    "Union members with young children have also been calling us concerned that their employer will force them to work before schools and childcare centres reopen after Wednesday." said Mr. Jones.

    Staff at a local fast food outlet unanimously voted to return home once they were reminded of their rights at work on Saturday. Whilst the discussion took place the store was rocked by one of the numerous aftershocks the city has felt over the weekend. The Canterbury Medical Health Officer has advised locals to stay away from their workplaces unless they are deemed fit by structural engineers. Both the Health and Safety Act and the Civil Defence Act support this statement

    "John Key will bail out property owners and big business using state cash but who will help out the thousands of low paid Christchurch workers who have lost jobs and incomes because of the quake? Key should provide instant cash relief to Christchurch's struggling working population."

    "Precarious and casual workers face unemployment, bankruptcy and hard times in Christchurch. If New Zealand's large corporations and employers cut adrift the workers of Christchurch then the city will face a social disaster on top of this natural disaster," concluded Mr. Jones.

    Unite is prepared to name and shame businesses that abandon or rip-off their workers in the aftermath of the earthquake. Workers' can call 0800 2 UNITE (0800 286 483) to share their story and seek workplace advice.

    Matt Jones | Christchurch & Nelson organiser

    Unite Union
    6A Western Springs Road
    Kingsland
    Auckland 1021
    New Zealand
    Phone: 029 201 3837
    Freephone: 0800 2 UNITE

    Website: www.unite.org.nz
    Email: matthew@unite.org.nz

    Sunday, 5 September 2010

    Matt McCarten: Sorry folks, but cancer won’t be shutting me up

    By Matt McCarten
    from Herald on Sunday

    It can be boring when someone talks about themselves. Today I’ll take the risk.

    I know I get into scraps and sometimes overstep the mark in clipping my opponents - and there’s always a few of them waiting impatiently for my demise.

    They may not have to wait too much longer. I was diagnosed a year ago with the killing kind of cancer.

    Saturday, 4 September 2010

    Christchurch earthquake

    By David

    Residents of Christchurch and nearby towns now, perhaps know a little of what it feels like to be in a city in Afghanistan when it's under attack from “Coalition Forces”.

    Except no one here is dead and although the ground continues to shake from time to time, we can be fairly confident the worst is over, and we know, of course, that none of this was deliberately planned to kill and destroy. Nevertheless, there must be some similarity in all such disasters, whether “natural” or deliberate.

    The sense of fear, confusion and isolation, with the power, phone and water cut off (fortunately none of these things happened in my neighborhood), not knowing the fate of friends and family, not knowing if you have suffered more or less than others.

    The varying reactions of panic and calm, “let’s get out of here”, or “let’s go back to bed” (do these things always happen in the middle of the night?).

    Then the warnings (ignored) about keeping off the roads, about boiling water for three minutes (does the jug do that?) and not flushing the toilet, because the sewerage system is wrecked. Cooking on the fire, as my parents are doing, or making alternative toilet arrangements as we are.

    Seeing the cracks in the chimney, seeing the holes in neighbors roofs, hearing of those injured and wondering if it's safe to sit near it.

    And now, learning that the damage is worse than first thought, of the of the central city and Kaiapoi evacuations, of the shelters set up in schools. I’m thinking of all the plumbers and electricians who will be working flat out for the next few days, while many of us aren’t sure what to do.

    Friday, 3 September 2010

    Postpone Burger Fuel pickets until Saturday 18th of September

    Tena koe,
     
    Please forward this email around your networks. Apologies for cross-posting.
     
    Matt McCarten (General Secretary of Unite), Joe Carolan (Unite’s action coordinator) and myself (as a witness for Solidarity Auckland) met this morning with Burger Fuel CEO Josef Roberts and the company’s lawyer at the company’s request.
     
    Josef Roberts and the company’s board have agreed to fairly compensate Joanne for her termination as of today.
     
    They have also agreed in principle to remove the 90-day no-rights trial period from their individual agreements.
     
    They have also agreed in principle to remove any anti-union conditions from their individual agreement and to update and improve it.
     
    Because the company is a franchise, Josef Roberts need to take the company’s position to the franchise owners for final agreement.
     
    This means he will be in a position to confirm the company’s final position within two weeks. However, he said he will try to get this done before then.
     
    Matt and Joe feel they will be able to negotiate a fair deal with the company.
     
    I certainly felt that the meeting was amicable and the company was keen to resolve the situation.
     
    My recommendation is that we postpone picketing until Saturday the 18th of September.
     
    Just because the action is off, doesn’t mean you can’t meet with other activists to talk about what to do next. Contact the person organising in your area and see if they want to meet up for coffee.
     
    This is just the start – join us in taking the next steps.
     
    Your commitment to solidarity has proven that direct action works. Although we didn’t take action, the threat of action is often as powerful. Our quick mobilising also proved that activists and supporters are ready to stand up to the attacks on our work rights, our right to organise and our living standards.
     
    This action is just one component of a new project (with a working title of “Solidarity”) to build solidarity across the community and workplaces (union and non-union) and put the movement back into the labour movement.
     
    I would like to take this opportunity to personally invite you to join us.
     
    ·         Join one of the new groups in your area: http://solidarity.org.nz/contact/solidarity-groups/
    ·         If there isn’t a group in your area, send me an email and I will put you in touch with other activists in your area or help you set something up
    ·         Reply to this email if you would like to join our database/newsletter so we can involve you in other actions in the future
     
    Thank-you again for your support.
     
    In solidarity,
     
    Simon Oosterman
    Solidarity Auckland Contact
    m. 021 922 551, w. www.solidarity.org.nz

    ‘The Long Emergency’, capitalism in PERIL

    By Peter de Waal

    James Howard Kunstler seems to have absorbed the ideas of Grant Morgan’s essay about the collapse of capitalism I forwarded to him some months ago: http://unityaotearoa.blogspot.com/2010/03/grant-morgan-beware-end-is-nigh.html

    Kunstler’s version is encapsulated in his latest on-line Pod cast – “KunstlerCast #122: A Grand Wobble”: http://www.kunstlercast.com

    At almost 49 minutes it is nearly a verbatim transcript of the essay’s key ideas. There are a few differences. Kunstler is unable to admit that “The Long Emergency” as he calls it could also mean the end of the capitalistic economic order as Grant suggests. You would expect that from an individual who describes himself as a “left-democrat.” Politics in the US seems unable to find another perspective. As Gore Vidal put it so succinctly: “America is a country governed by a single political party with two right wings.”

    Kunstler is also fixated on the paramount importance of the “peak oil” crisis as the key to understanding the current situation capitalism finds itself in. Capitalism certainly is facing energy crises, but if you stop there you would fail to see the other four crises baring down on the system:

    • Profitability crisis – squeezing the lifeblood of capitalism, capitalism has always had a "free lunch" from the earth and workers, now that’s over

    • Ecological crisis – undermining the natural basis for civilisation

    • Resource crises –  oil, water, food, minerals, land, you name it

    • Imperial crisis – US Power is declining, but global capitalism cannot support a bigger hegemon. Forget China – it can’t happen

    • Legitimacy crisis – both the leaders and the led are loosing faith in capitalism's destiny as it becomes more transparently undemocratic

    This is our PERIL thesis. Essentially the system has a number of problems that it can't resolve. Political systems can withstand one or two problems and work around them, but this is five all at the same time with no solutions available. Typically this is how civilisations end.

    Kunstler has an Americo-centric viewpoint. As my good friend Danny puts it: “You can’t read the label if you’re inside the bottle.” He would know, he’s from Texas, which generally has a reputation of being very inward looking and captured by Fox-thought from Chairman Murdoch. (not our Danny though, he’s a gem!)

    To a dweller in the southern ocean like me, the issue is not just the problem with this or that aspect of capitalism in America, it’s the whole damn system that’s in trouble world-wide.

    At one point Kunstler claims that financial speculation is counter-productive to the needs of humanity and what is instead needed is investment in the manufacture of real, useful products. This is ignoring the reason that capitalism turned in the late 1970s to financialisation in the first place, that is the falling rate of profit from investment in the production of ‘real objects’ due to market saturation.

    To deal with the problem of working class power and union organisation in the 1970s, raising wages in absolute terms and reducing profitability, manufacturing jobs were off-shored to brutal police states, like China. This created the problem of falling consumption, threatening the survival of the system.
    The answer was to lend Western workers and the middle classes, professionals and small businesses money via easy-credit schemes to maintain consumption, and therefore keep the third-world factories running.

    This is called “compensatory borrowing” by economists and was funded by creating massive inflation, particularly in the housing markets. Vast quantities of fictitious capital was created by “fractional reserve banking systems” and loaned out. The crisis of 2007-08 was about the loss of nerve amongst lenders, because it became impossible to disguise the fact that off-shored manufacturing and an economy of casualised low-pay jobs in the “service sector” means that the money loaned to the West can never be paid back.

    Essentially what we have is an economy that is a world-wide Ponzi scam. Unless “growth” can be maintained, asset values will plummet, halting the circulation of capital, world trade, etc. Sound familiar?

    At the end of his PodCast Kunstler admits that the reason Obama is so quiet at the moment is that he probably realises or has been told that the US economy is totally dependent on profits from the financialisation industry. Quite an admission and a key idea from Grant’s thesis.

    Still, listen to James Howard Kunstler on financialistion if you have the time. It’s a very good summary of how things are being run at the moment, an essentially is an admission that capitalism can’t fix it’s problems.

    Burger Fuel pickets this Saturday, noon to 2pm

    By Simon Oosterman

    Hi everyone,

    Everything is go for Burger Fuel picketting this Saturday from 12:00 – 2:00pm in your area! Below are the updated contacts for each area. Please forward this email amongst your contacts. Apologies for cross-posting.

    We still need contacts/organisers in Tauranga, Taupo, New Plymouth and Napier. If you know someone who you think would be good or could commit to being a contact person and can get supporters along, please contact me asap on 021 922 551. We have had contact from these areas but they would like someone to organise the picket for them.

    Thursday, 2 September 2010

    The postwar war in Iraq

    Eric Ruder explains what we should – and shouldn’t – expect from the “end of combat operations” in Iraq proclaimed by the Obama administration.

    from Socialist Worker US

    U.S. troops on patrol through Karadah in Iraq (Staff Sgt. Jason T. Bailey)

    “WE WON. It’s over, America. We brought democracy to Iraq.” Those were the words of a soldier from the 4th Stryker Brigade, supposedly among the last U.S. combat troops to leave Iraq, two weeks ahead of President Barack Obama's August 31 deadline for withdrawal.

    This is a watershed moment for Iraq. But not because the U.S. occupation is over or any of the other reasons put forward by the mainstream media.

    Taking action outside Fort Hood

    Cindy Beringer reports from Texas on an antiwar action outside Fort Hood.
    from Socialist Worker US

    Protesters organized by Iraq Veterans Against War march outside Fort Hood in July (Madeleine Dubus)
    Protesters organized by Iraq Veterans Against War march outside Fort Hood in July 
    (photo Madeleine Dubus)

     
    WHEN THE buses carrying the first group of soldiers of the 3rd Armored Calvary Regiment (ACR) stealthily approached the gates of Fort Hood in Texas, the protesters waiting outside had already won a victory.

    Members of the regiment have seen some of the worst fighting of the war in Iraq over the course of multiple deployments. At least 50 soldiers have physical and mental diagnoses that should prohibit their return to military duty, and many others probably have not sought treatment. And yet, the buses were there in order to deploy these soldiers again.

    A protest campaign against the 3rd ACR's redeployment had already brought unwelcome attention to the military's lack of concern for its soldiers.

    On August 22, activists and supporters were at it again. They gathered at Fort Hood in Killeen to be a part of a direct action against the redeployment of the first group of soldiers.

    Wednesday, 1 September 2010

    The best way you can counter Israel’s propaganda machine


    [Last Sunday] TVOne’s “Sunday” programme broadcast the BBC Panorama story “Death in the Med”.

    As
    Sunday” presenter Cameron Bennet made clear in his intro, this BBC Panorama story gives the Israeli version of the storming of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla on 31 May which left nine civilian aid workers dead and dozens injured.

    It’s the old, old story of an aggressor selling the propaganda line that really the victim was to blame for being attacked.

    Cameron Bennet asked the question: Will this Israeli version of history sway people? My answer: probably not many.

    The Israeli military attack on a humanitarian aid ship on the open sea in the dead of night was so indecent that the world’s majority are lining up against the illegal and immoral siege of Gaza’s 1.5 million people.

    If you do come across someone who is swayed by this Israeli propaganda, simply point them to Kia Ora Gaza’s website.


    Today [Monday] on kiaoragaza.net we have posted seven articles which, in different ways, expose the Israeli propaganda attack. These articles are:


    UN official criticises Israel over flotilla probe

    Just click on any headline above to take you to the article on our website.

    Kia Ora Gaza is fund-raising to send a six-person Kiwi Team to Gaza in three vehicles packed with humanitarian aid, such as medical equipment, educational supplies and building equipment. 

    Our brave Kiwi Team is joining the biggest aid convoy since the Second World War. 500 vehicles full of aid and staffed by over 1,000 volunteers from scores of different countries  will converge on Gaza in October.

    This historic convoy, led by UK-based charity Viva Palestina, will deliver humanitarian aid that is still banned by the state of Israel. And the convoy has a real chance of ending the Israeli siege of Gaza, or at least fatally weakening the blockade.

    Heres my message to you:  If you really want to bring both aid and justice to the people of Gaza, then donate generously to Kia Ora Gaza's humanitarian mission. Go to kiaoragaza.net to see how to donate.

    And if you have already made a donation, then how about making another? Your financial support for Kia Ora Gaza is the best way you can counter Israels propaganda machine.


    Thank you,


    Grant Morgan

    Co-organiser of Kia Ora Gaza
    021 2544 515

    Tuesday, 31 August 2010

    South Canterbury Finance: ‘A lot of bets in the casino paid off big time today.’

    It’s popular both in the “blogosphere” and on the Left to pan the mainstream media (MSM) for their often crappy reporting, bias in favour of the rich and powerful and so on. And most of the time this is right and true.

    At the same time, bloggers often depend on “real” reporters to dig out and even explain news that we wouldn’t otherwise know about. The following article from the Herald is a good example.

    It’s these “bargain hunting” speculators that the Tax Justice campaign is targeting with our call to “Tax Financial Speculation”.

    Thanks to Peter, for forwarding this. Here are his comments:

    $1.3 billion of government money paid out today to the speculators for Hubbard’s worthless South Canterbury Finance shares and bonds. Break out the $900 bottles of bubbly! Great news for the parasites, too bad for everybody else who happens to need a pay rise such as those pesky radiographers and teachers.

    This will also be paid for by all those unemployed people having their entitlements chiseled away and disabled people being hammered by the ACC and WINZ. Maier’s face says it all...


    Speculators reap fat reward as finance firm fails

    from NZ Herald

    Bargain hunters who bet against South Canterbury Finance in the NZX debt market will be rubbing their hands with glee today with the guarantee covering the failed financier’s listed bonds plus interest.

    The Timaru-based finance company called in the receivers today, triggering the government’s retail deposit guarantee which will pay out the face value for the firm’s debenture and bond holders.

    Prices for the company’s listed bond maturing in 2012, after the extended guarantee, fell to a deep discount earlier this year, with the yield reaching 40 per cent in March.

    That meant audacious punters could buy them cheap and get paid out in full if South Canterbury failed.

    “There will be a lot of money made in the listed bonds with prices up to 20, 30 and 40 per cent, which was all paid today,” chief executive Sandy Maier said in a conference call.

    “A lot of bets in the casino paid off big time today.”

    Sandy Maier

    The yield had abated in recent weeks, and was last at 24 per cent before trading in the security was suspended.

    The government will have to pay-out $125 million on the bonds.

    Maier said the guarantee, which many commentators claim distorts the market, gave him confidence to accept money from “widows and children” as he sought to save the company from collapse.

    The failure of the finance sector has seen a number of low-ball offers for debenture stock, and prompted the Securities Commission to warn investors to make an informed decision before accepting bids significantly below face value.